BU-353S4 VK-162 
Anyone has any experience about trying to make the uBlox 7 receiver work 
with RTKLib? 
 "u-blox 7 does not provide T-version of the module
at this moment.
RTKLIB requires T-version like LEA-5T or LEA-6T
to utilize raw pseudorange and carrier-phase.
So you cannot use u-blox 7 with RTKLIB. You had
better to wait for T-version of u-blox 7 or future 8.
regards,
Tomoji TAKAS"
Não rodou com rtklib mesmo deixando como solução Simples.
Ntrip com a RBMC-IP deu certo, mas precisa de outro receptor.
" Please let me explain some details to the actual and upcoming L1 
receivers which are enabled with carrier phase raw data output to 
prevent any confusion here...
The
 u-blox NEO-6P is able to deliver RTKLIB capable raw data with 5 Hz 
update rate (officially and in fact up to 10 Hz) as well as the NEO-6T 
which is the classic timing receiver module.
Both receiver variants are ROM versions, that means their firmware 
is not upgradeable (in opposite to the newer LEA-6T which contains flash
 for user upgradeable firmware but is unfortunately limited in a very 
poor update rate of less than 2 Hz).
The NEO-6P is significantly more expansive than the NEO-6T, due 
to its integrated PPP feature (which is quite useless in RTKLIB 
application scenarios).
But anyway, this PPP goodie (in fact a smart implementation of SBAS 
together with a "carrier smoothing") makes that the NEO-6P is the most 
bang for the buck in autonomous operation modes. 
The
 successor (NEO-7P) is flash based but nevertheless ready for an 
official update rate of 10 Hz, and is finally ready to use RTCM input 
instead resp. additional to SBAS.
So far, so good, but unfortunately it seems that there's still no GLONASS carrier phase raw data output. 
So
 if I should try to give a short conclusion and recommendation, I'd like
 to say that NVS is still the first choice at the moment, if you want to
 realize any "pure RTKLIB" applications...
Best regards from Eastern Germany,
Hagen"
"The M8 only supports RXM-RAWX and RXM-SFRBX, not the older forms, you 
will need to use a version of RTKLIB that supports that, or modify it 
too."
 "he fact is that u-blox does not _want_ you to use M8F/M8N/M8Q with 
rtklib. And don't take everything that this guy writes in his blog for 
granted."
"he fact is that u-blox does not _want_ you to use M8F/M8N/M8Q with 
rtklib. And don't take everything that this guy writes in his blog for 
granted."
"Do I need CORS data for the relative position to be accurate ? My closest CORS station is 27km away. Although I have access to an RTVRN
 network that works well. but I haven't done too much real time with it 
yet.
-  No, but it's not clear what you've actually tried beyond just "reading" 
the tutorials. Once you've established what the "process" is you can 
apply it to your own situation, and other unique things you might want 
to do without needing the specific use case mapped out."
"raw data from an M8N running 3.01 firmware, Nice!"
"I have tried to enable TRK-MEAS & TRK-SFRBX on my 3.01 M8N, and I 
don’t get any output. Is there a different command to enable them than 
there was on 2.01?"
"You'd use UBX-CFG-MSG (06 01) to enable message TRK-MEAS (03 10), use the UBX-??-?? (custom) dialog"
"MAX-M8 does not support the SFRBX messages.  Only the NEO-M8T and 
LEA-M8T precise timing receivers provide SFRBX messages.  This is 
described in the document: u-blox M8 Receiver Description and Protocol 
Specification under UBX-RXM-SFRBX."
"CFG-GNSS behaviour on MAX-M8Q-0-10 ROM CORE 3.01 (107888)"
Assinar:
Postar comentários (Atom)
 
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário